Logo FL trans smallfacebook icontwitter iconyoutube icon

[PRESS STATEMENT] SERI mourns the tragic passing of Justice Mokgoro & honours her enormous contribution to a more just and equal South Africa (15 May 2024).

YvonneMokgoro press statement combinedOn 9 May 2024, South Africa tragically lost Justice Yvonne Mokgoro.  A founding member and the first Black woman Justice of the Constitutional Court of South Africa, Justice Mokgoro will be remembered as an esteemed academic and jurist who embodied the values of the Constitution in her leadership and service to all.

South Africa as a whole, and all of us at SERI in particular, continue to benefit from Justice Mokgoro’s jurisprudence.  In the realm of socio-economic rights, Justice Mokgoro’s jurisprudence has provided a powerful legal foundation to strive for a more just and equal society, and for the benefit of the most indigent and vulnerable in our society.

Her distinctive contribution is enormous and profound. We choose to remember her words in three landmark judgments where she reminded us that ‘everyone’ means everyone under the Bill of Rights; that socio-economic rights are essential for human dignity; and that we are a society based on the value of ubuntu.

In Khosa v Minister of Social Development [2004] ZACC 11, Justice Mokgoro interpreted ‘everyone’ under the Bill of Rights. She held that the exclusion of permanent residents from social security benefits was unreasonable in violation of the right in section 27 and constituted unfair discrimination on the ground of citizenship.  Justice Mokgoro began by affirming that ‘[t]he socio-economic rights in our Constitution are closely related to the founding values of human dignity, equality and freedom’ [40], before recognising that vulnerability is not citizenship-dependent: ‘Equality in respect of access to socio-economic rights is implicit in the reference to “everyone” being entitled to have access to such rights in section 27.  Those who are unable to survive without social assistance are equally desperate and equally in need of such assistance’ [42].  It was for this reason that ‘the word “everyone” in this section cannot be construed as referring only to “citizens”’ [47].

Justice Mokgoro emphasised the link between human dignity and socio-economic rights in Jaftha v Schoeman [2004] ZACC 25.  For Justice Mokgoro, ‘[e]ach time an applicant approaches the courts claiming that his or her socio-economic rights have been infringed the right to dignity is invariably implicated’ [21].  In holding that the statutory regime governing the sale in execution of property to satisfy a debt was unconstitutional for a lack of judicial oversight, Justice Mokgoro explained:

‘Relative to homelessness, to have a home one calls one’s own, even under the most basic circumstances, can be a most empowering and dignifying human experience.  The impugned provisions have the potential of undermining that experience.  The provisions take indigent people who have already benefited from housing subsidies and, worse than placing them at the back of the queue to benefit again from such subsidies in the future, put them in a position where they might never again acquire such assistance, without which they may be rendered homeless and never able to restore the conditions for human dignity.’ [39]

Justice Mokgoro has championed the infusion of indigenous African values into the Constitution.  In the Constitutional Court’s famous judgment declaring the death penalty unconstitutional, S v Makwanyane [1995] ZACC 3, Justice Mokgoro emphasised that despite South Africa’s divided past, ‘one shared value and ideal that runs like a golden thread across cultural lines, is the value of ubuntu’ [306].  Justice Mokgoro’s employment of ubuntu captures a communitarian conception of human dignity as distinct from Western individualism, emphasising the fundamentally moral character of our Constitution in the struggle for transformative change:

‘Generally, ubuntu translates as humaneness.  In its most fundamental sense, it translates as personhood and morality.  Metaphorically, it expresses itself in umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu, describing the significance of group solidarity on survival issues so central to the survival of communities.  While it envelops the key values of group solidarity, compassion, respect, human dignity, conformity to basic norms and collective unity, in its fundamental sense it denotes humanity and morality.’ [307]

Justice Mokgoro stands out as a hero and a role model whose principled character we aspire to emulate.  We are indebted to her for the wisdom she has left with us as we pursue the just and equal society our Constitution commands.

We express our heartfelt condolences to Justice Mokgoro’s family, friends and loved ones at this time.

Contact details: 

  • Nomzamo Zondo, SERI executive director, nomzamo[at]seri-sa.org.

 

  • Download the statement here.

[SUBMISSION] SERI makes a submission to Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) on addressing xenophobia (29 March 2024).

CERD Submission cover 28March2024On 28 March 2024, the Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa (SERI) made a submission to the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) on the first draft of the Joint General Comment/Recommendation on "State Parties Obligations on Public Policies for Addressing and Eradicating Xenophobia and its impact on the rights of migrants, their families, and other non-citizens affected by racial discrimination". 

The submission shares comments and recommendations on four main areas, namely:

  • South Africa's definition of xenophobia in the National Plan Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance (National Plan): SERI recommends that the definition be expanded to include the concept of "institutional or structural xenophobia" and practices by law enforcement officials which constitute “profiling” of people who “look” or “sound” “foreign;
  • Elements of a comprehensive and holistic public policy aimed at preventing and eradicating xenophobia in migrant-receiving societies: SERI recommends that such a policy must include an early warning and rapid response mechanism, a mechanism for collating and publishing disaggregated data for tracking levels of violence and hate crimes, social mobilisation campaigns, and allow for public participation;
  • The need for an intersectional lens when addressing xenophobia: SERI recommends that the South African government be required to pay attention to the intersection of xenophobia with gender and socio-economic status to adhere to the international human rights standards affecting migrant women; and 
  • Accountability and the role of the criminal justice system in addressing xenophobia: SERI recommends that law enforcement agencies to investigate xenophobic crimes and convict guilty persons; act swiftly in response to an early warning and response mechanism and discipline, prosecute and convict law enforcement officials who partake in xenophobic practices.

 

  • Download the submission here.

[LITIGATION UPDATE] SERI represents Abahlali baseMjondolo in the SCA in a matter challenging the City of Cape Town's use of the Anti-Land Invasion Unit (8 May 2024).

On 7 May 2024, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) heard arguments in a matter between the South Africa Human Rights Commission v The City of Cape Town. The matter arises from the disturbing events of 1 July 2020 when armed Metro police, members of the City Anti-Land Invasion Unit accompanied by private contractors acting on the instruction of the City, arrived at the Ethembeni informal settlement in Khayelitsha, Cape Town. They proceeded to Mr. Bulelani Qolani’s shack and dragged him out, naked and in full view of surrounding residents. The City officials proceeded to demolish his shack. None of this was authorised by a court order.

SERI represents Abahlali baseMjondolo who are amicus curiae in the case because of their extensive experience with illegal actions performed by ALIU in Durban. Abahlali seeks to show the court the ALIU's track record in terms of its conduct and to demonstrate how its conduct in Cape Town is not meaningfully different that of the anti-land invasion units in eThekwini and Johannesburg.

On 15 July 2022, The Western Cape High Court handed down its order in which it found that a series of demolitions and evictions that took place in 2020 by the City of Cape Town, including that of Mr Qolani in Khayelitsha, were unlawful and unconstitutional. It also found that the City's interpretation and application of counter-spoliation is inconsistent with the Constitution and is invalid insofar as it permits demolitions of and evictions from any informal dwelling whether occupied or unoccupied at the time of the eviction or demolition.

The Court accepted Abahlali's submissions that the right to counter-spoliate is significantly narrower than the state and property owners have traditionally accepted which is that the requirement of possession need only be "peaceful and undisturbed" as interpreted in Yeko v Qana. This finding explicitly overrules the broader interpretation in Ness v Greef, which is the case often cited to argue that shackdwellers must have "durable and stable" occupation before a court order is required to remove them. This means that once a person is present on land with the intent to construct a shack, and manifests that intent by beginning to erect a structure, they are in possession and a court order is required to remove them. 

The City of Cape Town has appealed this order in the Supreme Court of Appeal. The matter was heard on 7 May 2024 and judgment was reserved. 

Read more about the case here

[PRESS STATEMENT] SERI and ICF welcome the report of the Khampepe Commission of Inquiry into Usindiso Building fire (7 May 2024).

Press statement Usindiso Commission ReportOn Sunday, 5 May 2024, Justice Khampepe published the report on part (a) (i) of the Terms of Reference of the Commission of Inquiry into Usindiso Building after it was submitted to the Gauteng Premier, Panyaza Lesufi. The report delves into the circumstances surrounding the fire that killed 76 individuals and left dozens injured and homeless. The Commission finds that the City of Johannesburg and its entities, including the Johannesburg Property Company (JPC), must bear partial responsibility and/or accountability for the tragedy and that that the consequences of the fire would have been mitigated had the City complied with its legal obligations as owner and municipality. 

Whilst the Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa (SERI) has no direct relationship with the residents of the building, it has participated in the Commission’s proceedings since its commencement in October 2023, acting on behalf of the Inner-City Federation (ICF) and itself. SERI and ICF have shared interest in ensuring that the recommendations made in part (a) (i) of the Terms of Reference and part (a) (ii) of the Terms of Reference are informed by the lived realities of people living in the inner city of Johannesburg, as well as the law and constitutional protections.

The Commission finds that the Usindiso building was abandoned by the City and the JPC since 2019 at least and that the City contravened various health, fire-safety, town planning and building control legislation as well as its own By-laws.The Commission recommends that disciplinary processes be initiated against the accounting officers of the City's entities, namely JPC, Johannesburg Water, City Power, and Pikitup, in cases where evidence indicates they failed to fulfil their duties. Had these duties been fulfilled, the tragedy at Usindiso building could have been prevented. 

SERI and ICF welcome the Commission’s findings and support the recommendation for disciplinary action against Ms. Helen Botes of the JPC, as well as considerations for MMCs for Human Settlements and Public Safety, alongside the accounting officers of Joburg Water, City Power, and Pikitup. We see these recommendations as a crucial step towards accountability and justice for the victims of this fire.

While we commend the Commission for its thorough assessment, we express disappointment for the absence of recommendations for payment of compensation to the victims and their families. We believe these would be crucial to address the urgent needs of those affected who were left destitute by the fire and have since been displaced. We are concerned that the report is silent on the evictions, detentions, and deportations of surviving residents. 

SERI and ICF agree with the Commission's assessment that the hazardous conditions in the Usindiso Building are symptomatic of the City's broader failure to address similar challenges in the inner-city of Johannesburg. SERI and ICF look forward to part (a) (ii) of the Terms of Reference, which will focus on the housing crisis in the inner city, presenting an opportunity to delve deeper into these systemic issues. 

In his address to the media, Premier Lesufi announced the establishment of an implementation committee, which SERI and ICF welcome. This initiative is as an important step towards ensuring that the Commission’s findings translate into tangible outcomes, particularly concerning the identification of deceased victims and the accountability of officials. We urge the Premier to be inclusive regarding the composition of this committee.

Contact details:  

  • Edward Molopi, SERI senior communications and advocacy officer, edward[at]seri-sa.org / 082 590 9638
  • Osmond Mngomezulu, SERI attorney, Osmond[at]seri-sa.org / 082 590 8826
  • Siyabonga Mahlangu, ICF executive member, innercityfederation[at]gmail.com

[END]

  • Download the full statement here
  • Access relevant material from the Usindiso Commission of Inquiry here.

[WORKSHOP] SERI presents on resisting evictions to the Women in Agricultural Rural Movement (3 May 2024).

Lakeside.jpgOn Thursday, 25 April, SERI was invited by the Women in Agricultural Rural Movement (WiARM) to present on housing and evictions law in South Africa. The workshop, hosted in the Lakeside Multi-Purpose Centre, was attended by 30 WiARM members and leaders for women in agriculture. SERI was joined by Legal Aid SA, ProBono.org and Legal Ascend for the workshop. 

SERI presented on the legal principles contained in the Constitution, the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998 ("PIE Act") and the Extension of Security of Tenure Act 62 of 1997 (“ESTA”). The presentation provided participants – the majority of whom are women – with insight on how to use these sources to challenge and resist evictions. The presentation was offered by SERI’s gender equity analyst and legal researcher, Nerishka Singh, and litigation intern, Justin Winchester. The workshop formed part of SERI’s popular education advocacy and SERI’s work in Women’s Spaces Project.